Has the 1917 Constitution failed to meet all the demands emanating from the Mexican Revolution , including education, employment and land ?
It was possible to define the demands and needs of the time but were not met or are met 100% of these claims or these items.
Education Article 3: in education was defined to be free and compulsory secular and is very well written and in theory, but to date this article does not cover 100% of the population.
- There is a forward and illiteracy rate decreases .
He created the SEP . giving it autonomy and is mainly promotes rural development, much needed in these days so far.
Article 27 - With regard to land distribution : not delivered to people who really needed them , and today the land is owned by who steals or who has to pay , great example for Cancun where foreigners are owners alleged areas protected by law . Another case is the expotación reef hands who does not respect the law , as well as land and sea areas , here too hard for coming Asian tuna fishing in Mexican maritime zones , breaking the law and no one will punished. Again you can see that in theory sounds good constitution but this does not apply pursuant to Article 27.
Employment Article 123 .. - First says that everyone has the right to decent work ... (very difficult to determine who is " worthy" , decent refire to imagine that it can live and considering this, as very few have a decent work , I mean that is poorly written this article as using the word " dignified " brings many complications in any case should sue all legislators and all rulers and demand the repair of damages for violation of this article, and I consider the minimum wage as " not worthy " , therefore all rulers have ignored this article (as I tell you that the minimum wage is for you, but they must win high as 200 minimum wages , plus themselves their wages are regulated, and jokingly is the only thing that put all insult agreement ! or crushing the people) so the nation should sue for violation of this article to all the governors from 1917 to date.
And yes ... follow the patterns of abuse in previous times had worse employment status .
Although it is a process that takes years , I think that it took much longer to implement . and these days the land is people who have economic and political power , in corresponding employment, are recognized and protected workers , which made huge gains in welfare and wage stability , although today there are patterns that do not respect the provisions of article 123 of the constitution .
Think that Article 3 of the Constitution has really helped to improve education in our country? Or in your case , what aspects or modificarías would respect this article ?
The article and the constitution are very well drawn and their demands are applied to society then and today's society, I do not think I require any changes. The important thing is to apply these items to 100 % Which does not happen and this brings a number of major problems and with many variations due to social inequality.
Article 27 provides the foundation and structure of education, very important , and it's just going to be 100 years old and has not managed to achieve the maximum.
One of the root causes of the armed struggle of 1910 was land distribution and land tenure , from this Article 27 is made , reflecting on her today, are an update of this article consider necessary What aspects modificarías ?
Here I think the objective was met if respected and applied in most cases, but if you need to expand some definitions and also the right of the people to demand compensation for ecological damage and regulate the exploitation of natural resources. eg Cancun is 85 % owned by foreign investors their most Spaniards and Americans , they come and pay for land protected areas , damage to the environment and the social environment ( exploitation of employees) destroyed the ecosystem, mangroves, lagoons , reefs and nobody says anything ... california now is down south for Cabo Pulmo , which aims to exploit and destroy the marine ecosystem eagerly exploited for private gain . Which is very bad and the constitution does not give us the right to claim our lands and marine areas exploited at no respect for nature , the ecosystem and the relationship between these two and humans.
Article 27 In short if many updates require the use to be given to those lands and who can claim in case of abuse .
Today it is common to hear of the need for labor reform in this sense , and after reviewing the Article 123 , do you think that meets current business conditions in the country , or is that a reform of this constitutional provision ? What aspects or modificarías would respect this article ?
says that everyone has the right to decent work ... (very difficult to determine who is " worthy " decent refire to imagine that it can live and considering this, as very few have a decent job , I mean that is wrong written this article as using the word " dignified " brings many complications in any case should sue all legislators and all rulers and demand the repair of damages for violation of this article because I think the minimum wage as " not worthy "
Article 123 is the most backward , does not apply , everything explodes and pattern you get you are seeing more and more out without repay you all , and miss you steal this article, and the worst is that you'll need to accept , and having no choice you stay here , but really do not like the item you can not do anything , the only thing left is to denounce Cunado this is not carried out . is expensive but always stay without work, without compensation and with our low morale due to abuse of our constitutional rights. labor exploitation is enough !
Here are some examples:
- extension of working hours. Why? because it says the boss, you do not like these fired anyway or contract you have.
- you do not pay bonuses
- I did not get your rest times
- access to health services are denied
Non - wage law
- wages within the law is not enough to name your work as decent work .
- Trafficking in Persons (slaves of this century)
- working children
- elderly without pension or a pension so miserable that it seems that the government hopes to get rid of them when they die of hunger.
Statistics show that 80 % of companies violate one way or another your employment rights.
No comments:
Post a Comment